The CG Game World Committee

Making a proposal:

The GWC doesn't create things for the game world; rather, we maintain the continuity and integrity of that world. We are the caretakers, and it's the entire Quest community that are the creators. While many submissions come from GWC members, anyone can make a proposal, and we encourage you to do so! Just send your proposal to cg-chair@quest.org.

If you're looking to make a character proposal, be sure to read the character proposal guidelines first.

Current queue:

currently:

Character Debt proposal, by Meg Hxarrelson

In effect:

We set standard treasure for GMs.
We established how languages work.
We clarified how the Null in Valenne works.
We defined how players can make alchemical items.
We set how GMs can give out potions at their events.
We set guidelines for how to come up with saints' names.
We defined how patron saints work.
We listed Hesket's universities.
We defined how someone gets "Rank 3" Status.
We have defined what exactly mana is and how it works in-game.
We have approved guidelines on how to propose an arc.
We have approved an economy proposal from John Eure.
We have defined how the GWC interfaces with the Publisher.

Taking effect with the 2009 rulebook:

remove permanent death by allowing people to purchase more Miracles, by Steve Hxartley

Past proposals that took effect with a given rulebook edition:

2007 rulebook update:

Clarifying "CG 'one-shots'", by Jeff Yxaus
GM-friendly Teleport (all 3 proposals)

2006 rulebook:

Replace the -1/2 point death penalty with Resurrection Trauma, by John Eure and Sam Sherry
Clarifying gender equality in the CG

2005 rulebook update:

Reiterating gender equality in the CG

2004 rulebook:

Re-adding Fendel to the rule description for Miracle
Renaming Stigma from "Race" to "Group"
Adding Stigma: Disliked Group for known Kahla-Ranites

Our Charter

(as defined by the Board of Directors, fall 1998)

The GWC maintains the continuity and integrity of the gameworld. They codify material that GMs and Players bring into game. They reconcile/justify contradictory or questionable canon. They will always attempt to reconcile contradictory material, if possible, but they are empowered to make final decisions in the best interests of the Game World if reconciliation is not possible.